|
|
You may freely copy
any of my files and print it out provided you keep my Email and web address
on it.
http://evolution.htmlplanet.com
The disaster that thalidomide caused was because one of the components had a mixture of left and right-handed components. Adults seemed to have coped with this, possibly because their system is able to detect and reject faulty components, but perhaps a fetus doesn't have the ability to differentiate and reject faulty components, and some get included in strategic positions.
Primordial pool, thermal vent situations.
In some primordial pool, thermal vent, or any situation amino acids and sugars would rapidly combine in a way that would destroy each other, making the result useless for life, unless re-worked by a living organism. In order for amino acids and sugars to be formed into the nucleotides they must be controlled and assisted to bond correctly by enzymes or catalyst to reduce the energy needed to make the connection. In the wild there is nothing to control this process, so it would never happen, and DNA or RNA could never form by non-living chemical biogenesis.
Even if nucleotides were created correctly, in order to join them up in the correct way as the backbone of the DNA, they need energy to get them over the threshold to push them together. But this requires the organised action of at least one hundred enzymes, a type of protein. The average protein has 400 amino acids, which must all be left-handed, but if occurring naturally, which can't happen, would be a mixture of left and right-handed acids, but living systems only make the left-handed version, so we assume that these enzymes are correct, if they were made by a living system.
But how to produce the essential enzymes.
The only way these can come about is by a living system producing them, as the complexity is vastly beyond accidents, particularly as the amino acids in them must be all left, and all the sugars right-handed. They are not a simple repetitive string, but must be able to fold up in a precise way in order to work. This requires a set of instructions to be followed exactly, and this is in the DNA. This has to be copied to RNA, and then the enzyme is produced, and then folded with assistance, to get it into the working configuration.
The Problem.
The problem is that until you have the DNA and the copying mechanism, protected from chemical interference, and the energy and the instruction to trigger the production of each of about 100 enzymes, and then the controlling mechanism to put them to work assembling the amino acids and sugars into the backbone of the RNA or DNA, you cannot produce RNA or DNA. This work can only be done by a living system, which could only be produced by a living system, because only a living system has the instructions in the DNA to form the enzymes that are essential for the process of forming the DNA, for a living system.
Life cannot form accidentally from any possible imagined chemical mix, it must be organised and controlled, and programmed to live and to reproduce, or else no life. So first came information, and manipulative control to produce the first life of each basic type. So who did it? Don't try the usual "it came from space", because the same chemical problems apply throughout all time and space, in every galaxy, because chemicals are chemicals and react the same, every time, whatever the temperature, whatever the radiation, whatever the electrical charge, for all pressures, for all gravitational fields, the same conditions produce the same results.
Richard Dawkins "The God Delusion"
In his book "the God delusion" Richard Dawkins says"...we can make the point that, however improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here" p137. That assumption is his best evidence after years of writing and lecturing in support of evolution and against God, what a miserable failure. He wants you to take a great leap of faith and believe something that science has already proved cannot happen, making evolution a religious belief as it has to be on blind faith, as in spite of enormous scientific research there is no supporting evidence. If you ever read his books you should take note that he never gives reasonable scientific evidence to support this claim, just a statement of a religiously held conviction, or some unworkable story, don't believe him. His statement could be continued with, "because God created us here", it would be just as logical from his statement. The Bible gives you great supporting evidence that there is a God, and that He did create all life, and also tells you why you are here, and where you are liable to go, only two destination options, you choose which one.
Millers experiment.
In 1953 Stanley Miller fired sparks through some selected gasses, probably nothing like anything that would have been on earth, and produced some amino acid. This was widely published as having virtually produced life in a test tube, producing "organic" molecules, and lauded as a great support for evolution. What is misleading is that any molecule that contains a carbon atom is classed as organic, even though it could actually be poisonous, and is not necessarily used in living things. Also the amino acid had to be caught in a filter to stop it being destroyed by the process that created it. As usual it was a mix of left and right-handed acids, both of which would join into any further processes and destroy any chance of producing a useful enzyme or protein, because of mixed handedness, not that there was any directing force to cause the process in Millers experiment. It seems to be a totally undeserved reputation.
Amino acids make nothing by themselves, sugars and other chemistry are needed. If sugar was also present, but wasn't in Millers experiment, the amino acid and sugars would have destroyed each other, putting an end to any hopes, because they were not being controlled. In real life Millers experiment doesn't work because the associated chemistry would destroy any amino acid or sugars as soon as they formed. Even evolutionists say that Millers mixture of gases was nothing like a realistic mix that might have existed. A more probable mix produces virtually no amino acid, but still mixed handedness and useless for life, because there is no sorting mechanism without life.
School and university.
It is unlikely that the school or university text books will tell you of these problems, as the evolution paradigm is pushed to the limit of belief, and beyond. But if you are astute and on the lookout for the hopeful exaggerations that bridge the gaps that science cannot bridge, you will see a whole new side to life that evolutionists didn't want you to see. Keep asking questions about the claims to see if it is scientifically valid for the actual facts given, but sometimes the claimed facts are not true anyway.
Creation.
Asking questions also works for creation as it is based on science and research, often the same facts as the evolutionists claim proves evolution, but looking from a much more scientific point of view as God demands honesty, which is not required by the belief of evolution, is spurned in fact, as dishonesty may be more advantageous for you. Dawkins used an intelligently designed computer and programs, to run his program, set up so it could not fail to get the predetermined result, "methinks it is like a weasel", then claims it proves that unguided evolution, knowing nothing of the required result, must produce the wonderful things we see, and it makes evolution so obvious and easy to understand. The claim is an outright lie, it proves that intelligence and manipulation (of materials, to make the computer and programs), can achieve desired results, similarly intelligence and manipulation was required for the first life, but no it doubt brought him much kudos. Dostoyevsky said "without god everything is permissable; crime is inevitable". I would add, also wacky evolution theories about the untestable past, linking unrelated creatures, because the bones can be imagined as similar, and it makes a good story. The spiritual aspect, which is not part of the scientific basis of creation, which stands on the true science involved, though it is the reason for pursuing the investigation, cannot be tested in the science laboratory, but can be checked out by comparing the prophesies and descriptions of kingdoms, cities etcetera in the Bible and with actual history and archeological discoveries, also in the prophesies about the present times, when Israel becomes a nation after a long dispersion (2000 years). For further proof of the spiritual side you have to take a leap of faith and ask God, as there cannot be a scientific test, only a personal relationship will reveal the truth, and you desperately need that relationship.
Other things that are misrepresented.
Haeckels embryo diagrams were faked, as was proved at the time, and now further research has found that even parts that look the same can be produced by totally different processes, and deny claims of relatedness. A frogs "hand" and ours finish up looking as if related, but a frogs develops as a bony plate and then dissolves out the gaps, while our fingers develop from buds.
Peppered moths breed just the same as always, they don't sit on the tree trunks, that was staged for filming and photos, as it was claimed as proof of evolution. All the evidence proves stasis, the opposite of what evolution needs.
Humans never had any vestigial organs, scientists eventually caught up with the facts.
At last we have found the missing link between humans and apes! Wait till the hype dies down and you will see that they never have. Make a list of them from piltdown man through a whole lot of frauds.
Whales evolved from. . . . . from cows at one time, but it is always highly imaginative, with huge jumps of imagination, with no actual evidence of connectedness, there is no evidence to show whales ever evolved, they were always whales. It is also claimed that one of the most closely related animal to the pig is the whale, and some people actually believe this rubbish! This is true of everything in the fossil record, if it is not extinct then it closely matches its living descendants. If you only have part of a skeleton it is easier to make up some new creature, but even if it matches other skeletons, or its living descendants, but is claimed to be older, it is usually given a different name, to help support evolution. Even if they are known to be the same, but were found by someone else, or in a different area they are given a different name. The finder wants the kudos, it helps with financing further research. If you want to research whether or not evolution is possible , you won't get any finance, but if you want to research by which path it happened you will be showered with money and can work happily for years achieving nothing.
One tooth found in 1922 was enough to create a whole human family, fully illustrated, and called Nebraska man, the first ape-man found in North America. In 1927 it was decided that the tooth was from an extinct peccary (pig).
Feathers evolved from scales, I can't imagine a more ridiculous claim. Scales are flat platelets on the outside of the skin, but feathers are embedded similar to hairs, but with much more complexity. Even Darwin knew (or should have) that they didn't evolve from scales, as he probably used a quill for writing.
Because the evidence "must prove evolution", a religious requirement, there has to be a lot of "hopeful guess work" to try to bridge the impossible gaps. This leads to a lot of assumed ancestors, with a lot of swapping as someone else claims the high ground of having solved the evolutionary problems of the line of decent, from or through the missing links (still to be found) to some other claimed ancestor. But it doesn't usually last long as other evolutionists easily prove it is wrong, or throw considerable doubt on the connection. But in the mean time it helps to keep the story of evolution accepted by those who don't look carefully into the details and question if the claims could genuinely be drawn from the evidence.
Were you taught the truth?
Why you were not taught the truth about the complexity of life, even the simplest replicating cell is not anything like simple. Even a virus is extremely complex, but it cannot reproduce itself, as it doesn't have the copying mechanism. It has to invade a larger cell and insert its DNA into the copying system, and set the cell to make multiple copies. But how would it know how to do that? Was your education slanted to try to blot God out, and make you feel free to do your own thing, irrespective of any good moral system, or respect for other people and their welfare. The first rule of evolution is that you must not let a divine foot in the door, but why not if that is the truth? Can you ever find the truth if you exclude it at the start? Its only in your wildest imagination that evolution could happen, but consider why you would want to avoid the truth.
Don't go through life avoiding truth like the Queen of Hearts who could "believe seven impossible things before breakfast".
URLs with scientific information on the subject
or guidance based on scientific truth not evolutionary hype.
If you have been snubbing God because you believe in evolution, you need to read about the many things that show that evolution cannot happen. One good evidence is the tiny acid driven rotary motor that is in every cell of your body, to produce ATP, and ADP, the cells energy fuel. Read "ATP The perfect Energy Currency for the Cell", and other evidence
at:-
True
Origin -Fascinating, easily understood data on evolution's problems.
skull 1470.htm An extensive article with information from Leaky and other evolutionists.
www.answersingenesis.org
- Answers in Genesis Presents the creationist side of the debate. Includes many articles and audio and video files of debates and discussions on the issue. Extensive scientific and general interest Articles, showing how well most science and fossils fit into the biblical perspective, without requiring a belief in a God.
http://angelfire.com/ak5/once_saved A disastrous tale of woe. Make sure you don't get caught out with one of these Bible verses that warn of the loss of salvation. Exchangedlife.com
A section on creation/evolution and some articles on prophesy, some of which is still ahead of us, showing that someone back then knew the future.
About family life and values:- Above Rubies -See the latest
experiences and testimonies at Above Rubies.
Comments, criticisms and suggestions gratefully received.
You may freely copy
any of my files and print it out provided you keep my Email and web address
on it.
This web site operated by:-Alfred.
Focus on Family values - Guidance
for a good life style, that is based on good principles.
This web page operated by:-webmaster@evolution.htmlplanet.com
Comments, criticisms and suggestions gratefully received. It helps to know what people want to know about.
http://evolution.htmlplanet.com
alfredem@paradise.net.nz.
There are only two choices for where you go after this life:
